Saturday, February 28, 2009

This is a great list of where the stimulus money will be going. It is broken down by state, city and then each project.


Find projects by state or territory

Friday, February 27, 2009

mankind's earliest sound recordings

FirstSounds.ORG
Home > Sounds

Sounds

First Sounds has pioneered the recovery of sounds recorded on phonautograms - many of which were made before Edison invented the phonograph in 1877. The samples below are among the world's earliest sound recordings.

These sounds are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (by) license and may be redistributed or sampled; all we ask is that you provide First Sounds with a copy of your work. Also, if using the sounds on your website, please save the file and host on your server. Note that these files are not excerpts; they are the full tracks as processed so far.

(The files can be saved by right-clicking on the link and selecting the save option offered by your web browser.)

Au Clair de la Lune--French folk song (1860 Phonautogram)

Scott recorded someone singing an excerpt from the French folksong "Au Clair de la Lune" on April 9, 1860, and deposited the results with the Académie des Sciences in 1861. The existence of a tuning-fork calibration trace allows us to compensate for the irregular recording speed of the hand-cranked cylinder. The sheet contains the beginning line of the second verse - "Au clair de la lune, Pierrot répondit" - and is the earliest audibly recognizable record of the human voice yet recovered.

We released this sound in March 2008, and it has become the icon of humanity's first recording of its own voice. In September we undertook a second restoration using more advanced technologies. Both versions are below.

Gamme de la Voix - Vocal scale (1860 Phonautogram) * NEW *

On May 17, 1860 - five weeks after recording "Au Clair de la Lune" - Scott and his singer returned to his studio to record a simple vocal scale. He deposited this phonautogram with "Au Clair" and other samples of his work at the Académie des Sciences in 1861. This is the second-oldest recognizable recording of the human voice yet retrieved.

We present two restorations of this recording. The first includes crosstalk from his tuning fork that leaked onto the voice track. The second renders the voice without the tuning fork crossover, as Scott intended to record it.

Phonautographie de la voix humaine à distance--excerpts, at different speeds (1857 Phonautogram)

Scott identified the sheet of phonautograms he deposited with the Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle in 1857 as documenting "the human voice at a distance." Two brief excerpts from two different records on this sheet are the earliest traces of his work played back to date, but his recording methods were not yet sophisticated enough at this time to yield audibly recognizable results. Here we present the two excerpts played at several different speeds.

Diapason at 435 Hz--at sequential stages of restoration (1859 Phonautogram)

Scott attached another phonautogram to the "certificate of addition" he deposited with the Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle in 1859. We believe it to be a record made by a tuning fork vibrating at 435 Hz, then just adopted as the official French reference pitch. This is the oldest recognizable sound yet reproduced and is presented here at successive stages of restoration.

Metropolitan Elevated Railroad from 40 feet away (1878 Phonautogram)

In 1878, when Thomas Edison was hired to study the objectionable noise produced by the Metropolitan Elevated Railroad in New York City, he turned to the phonautograph, adapting one of his tinfoil phonographs to draw a "readable" lateral waveform. Edison's colleague Charles Batchelor made this particular phonautogram as part of that project in September. We believe the excerpt presented here begins and ends with test shouts, with three specimens of actual train noise in between-the earliest American sounds yet reproduced. Note that pitch fluctuations are due at least in part to the irregular recording speed.

.abovetopsecret

We all experience coincidences almost every day, some small and insignificant, some large and thought provoking. However, there can't be many which can compare, either because of the infinitesimaly small probablity of occurrence or awe-inspiring wonder, with the Solar Eclipse.



Consider this:

Earth's Moon has a diameter of roughly 3500km

The Sun has a diameter of roughly 1,400,000km

1400000 divided by 3500 = 400

So the Sun has a diameter 400 times larger than that of the Moon.

The distance of the Moon from the Earth is roughly 375,000km

The distance of the Sun from the Earth is roughly 150,000,000km

150 million divided by 375,000 = 400

So the Sun is 400 times further away than the Moon
(I have rounded the exact scales for the sake of simplicity)

To reiterate that:

The Sun is 400 times bigger than the Moon but also 400 times further away.

As you can see this amazing set of circumstances concerning the relative sizes and distances between the Earth, Moon and Sun give rise to the incredible phenomena of Solar Eclipses.

The Moon and the Sun both appear to be THE SAME SIZE from our perspective here on Earth even though the Sun is vastly bigger. In fact, during an eclipse, the Moon blocks out the Sun so perfectly that only sunlight travelling through valleys on the moons surface can be seen!

This is what enables what's known as the diamond ring effect seen in the photo above.

What a coincidence. The chances of the situation WE have actually arising on a planet have got to be sooooooo tiny as to be virtually incalculable. In other
words, How lucky are we?!?

And as if that wasn't enough, this hasn't been the case throughout all of Earth's history. The Moon is actually steadily moving away from Earth at about 3.8cm a year so 200 million years ago for example, the Moon would have been too close and too big, more than blocking out the Sun entirely. Conversely, in a few hundred million years the Moon will be too far away and too small to cover the whole Sun during an eclispe.

So, not only have we got the relative distances/sizes to perplex us, but also the fact that intelligent life (us) just happened to evolve within this comparably small period of Earth's history when the Moon appears just right to enable the amazing curiosity of a Solar eclipse to be possible!

Another point of interest is the fact that we have an abnormally large Moon and how this may go some way as to explain why life even evolved here in the first place. The stabalizing effect the Moon's gravity has on the Earth's wobble may well have played a part in the creating the stable environment life requires to evolve, or at least increased the chances of it happening.

phew! Its a lot to take in I know and boggles my mind thinking about it but believe it or not, it gets weirder!

During Solar eclipses, it has been recorded that a pendulum's motion will be perturbed pretty drastically in a way which is not explainable using standard
gravitational models. Known as the 'Allais effect', the phenomenon is controversial and widely disputed amoungst the astrophysical community.


Throughout Human history Solar eclipses have been a source of wonder and amazement. Linked with prophecy, divine activity and a vast array of spiritual events, signs and miracles. Personally, I can think of no other coincidence that even comes close to matching this in scope (unless you get started on Anthropic principle), and it's no wonder the event has always been revered.

It all seems a little bit too much doesn't it? Maybe TOO MUCH of a coincidence for there not to be somthing profound or supernatural behind it...

Imagine some time in the future, if and when we finally become part of 'the Galactic community' if there is such a thing, Alien races will travel to Earth to witness the amazingly unlikely spectacle known as an eclipse. They will gaze in wonder and admiration, all the while envious of our tiny blue dot and how incredibly lucky we are to be on it.

Thanks

Let the wild speculation commence!


sources:

eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov...

en.wikipedia.org...

www.newscientist.com...

ares.jsc.nasa.gov...

www.science-frontiers.com...

en.wikipedia.org...

www.absoluteastronomy.com...

Friday, February 20, 2009

Index of /STATES

      Name                    Last modified       Size  Description


[DIR] Parent Directory 16-Feb-2009 13:59 -
[DIR] 1-GRADES/ 08-Mar-2008 17:16 -
[DIR] ACROBAT READER 6.0/ 30-Aug-2005 08:07 -
[DIR] ALABAMA/ 12-Apr-2008 12:31 -
[DIR] ALASKA/ 30-Aug-2005 08:08 -
[DIR] ARIZONA DIRECTORY/ 03-Apr-2007 20:03 -
[DIR] ARKANSAS/ 30-Aug-2005 08:10 -
[DIR] CALIFORNIA DIRECTORY/ 15-Apr-2007 21:17 -
[DIR] CANADA/ 30-Aug-2008 12:23 -
[DIR] COLORADO/ 30-Aug-2005 08:32 -
[DIR] CONNECTICUT/ 27-Aug-2005 13:28 -
[DIR] FEDERAL-FINANCIAL ST..> 02-May-2007 11:18 -
[DIR] FEDERAL-GAO-AUDIT-OF..> 05-Nov-2008 11:02 -
[DIR] FEDERAL-RESERVE/ 24-Aug-2008 01:20 -
[DIR] FLORIDA/ 03-Apr-2007 22:05 -
[DIR] GEORGIA/ 30-Aug-2005 08:38 -
[DIR] HAWAII/ 30-Aug-2005 08:39 -
[DIR] IDAHO/ 30-Aug-2005 08:40 -
[DIR] ILLINOIS/ 30-Aug-2005 08:41 -
[DIR] INDIANA/ 30-Aug-2005 08:41 -
[DIR] IOWA/ 30-Aug-2005 08:43 -
[DIR] KANSAS/ 30-Aug-2005 08:44 -
[DIR] KENNTUCKY/ 30-Aug-2005 08:58 -
[DIR] LOUISIANA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:02 -
[DIR] MAINE/ 30-Aug-2005 09:03 -
[DIR] MARYLAND/ 03-Nov-2006 09:41 -
[DIR] MASSACHUSETTS/ 30-Aug-2005 09:09 -
[DIR] MICHIGAN/ 30-Aug-2005 09:10 -
[DIR] MINNESOTA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:21 -
[DIR] MISSISSIPPI/ 30-Aug-2005 09:22 -
[DIR] MISSOURI/ 30-Aug-2005 09:24 -
[DIR] MONTANA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:26 -
[DIR] NEVADA/ 15-Jan-2009 11:15 -
[DIR] NEWHAMPSHIRE/ 30-Aug-2005 09:28 -
[DIR] NEWJERSEY/ 30-Aug-2005 09:28 -
[DIR] NEWMEXICO/ 03-Nov-2006 09:56 -
[DIR] NEWYORK/ 02-Feb-2007 12:43 -
[DIR] NORTHCAROLINA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:32 -
[DIR] NORTHDAKOTA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:33 -
[DIR] OHIO/ 30-Aug-2005 09:34 -
[DIR] OKLAHOMA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:38 -
[DIR] OREGON/ 17-Dec-2008 21:30 -
[DIR] PA/ 22-Sep-2008 13:32 -
[DIR] SOUTHCAROLINA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:43 -
[DIR] SOUTHDAKOTA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:45 -
[DIR] TENNESSEE/ 30-Aug-2005 09:48 -
[DIR] TEXAS/ 30-Aug-2005 09:49 -
[DIR] US-TreasuryReports/ 22-Sep-2008 12:06 -
[DIR] UTAH/ 30-Aug-2005 09:53 -
[DIR] VERMONT/ 30-Aug-2005 09:54 -
[DIR] VIRGINIA/ 30-Aug-2005 09:55 -
[DIR] WASHINGTON/ 02-Feb-2007 14:01 -
[DIR] WISCONSIN/ 06-Feb-2007 06:38 -