Friday, September 28, 2007

J.A.I.L. News Journal

Los Angeles, California
April 5, 2007
The Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power
A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

The Constitution is Valid for Today
By Barbie, ACIC National J.A.I.L.
Ever since the South Dakota J.A.I.L. election fiasco, we were shocked to learn, as it happened in real time, that we do not have a government in that state, but a foreign power in control as we discovered from the utter fraud, deception, and propaganda perpetrated on South Dakotans throughout the J.A.I.L. (Amendment E) 2006 campaign. It is fully documented on record at As a result, we placed on our JNJ heading: "The Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power; A Power Foreign to Our Constitution." Our mission since has been to inform the People of this foreign power so that they will no longer be the ignorant masses upon which the foreign power depends for its survival. J.A.I.L., through an informed People, will throw off the foreign power; and they know it!

"Foreign to our Constitution" is taken from our Declaration of Independence which lists one of the many grievances as "He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation." In this country, "he" is not the king, but the judiciary. That's exactly what happened in South Dakota. Every act done by the South Dakota Foreign Power during the J.A.I.L. campaign was in violation of the Constitutions, both state and federal, as well as state law, and assented to by the judiciary.

Our attention is now drawn to the theory that "We have no Constitution." I say "theory" because it would be impossible for the People to exist as an ordered society without a supreme law of the land to govern them. With all of its imperfections, we certainly do have "The Constitution for the United States of America" which society has accepted as The Supreme Law of the Land. The legitimacy of the Constitution is reported in a Law Review "Legitimacy and The Constitution" by Richard H. Fallon, Jr.
(excerpts) "... As measured by sociological criteria, the Constitution or a claim of legal authority is legitimate insofar as it is accepted (as a matter of fact) as deserving of respect or obedience ... In the Weberian [Max Weber] sense, legitimacy signifies an active belief by citizens, whether warranted or not, that particular claims to authority deserve respect or obedience for reasons not restricted to self-interest. ... [T]he question of the Constitution’s moral legitimacy presupposes its legal legitimacy. If the Constitution were not positive law, the question of its moral legitimacy would not arise. Today the presupposition that the Constitution is valid law is undoubtedly correct. ... The Constitution’s moral legitimacy, like that of the constitutions of most nations, arises from the facts that it exists, that it is accepted as law, that it is reasonably (rather than completely) just, and that agreement to a better constitution would be difficult if not impossible to achieve. ... "
John Locke, whose philosophy centers around the inherent rights of mankind based on the laws of nature, was the mentor of Thomas Jefferson when he wrote the Declaration of Independence which finds its basis on the separate and equal standing to which people are entitled under "the laws of nature and of nature's God." Locke has much to say about the laws of nature indicating the necessity of mankind to form a power of community (government) for the effective protection of their property in society. He points out that the only effective way people could institute such government for their protection is by their own consent under a written compact, which in America is titled "The Constitution."
Some particular points made by Locke in his Second Treatise on Government, in
Chapter VIII : Of the Beginning of Political Societies, he states
that no one can be put out of the state of nature and into the bonds of civil society without his own consent (Sect. 95); that such consent to unite into one political society must be recorded by compact, only by which could give beginning to any lawful government (Sect. 99). In Chapter IX: Of the Ends of Political Society and Government
he states that the first want of mankind in putting themselves under government is an established constitution allowed by their consent (Sect. 124); that government is bound to govern by established standing laws guided by the Constitution (Sect. 131).
Despite all of that self-evident truth regarding not only the historical existence and sociological acceptance by American society of our Constitution, but the necessity for it according to the laws of nature as explained by John Locke; plus the fact that it is recorded in the Declaration of Independence that the people in colonial America separated themselves from Great Britain due to facts showing the repeated injuries and usurpations by the king; yet there is a worldly evil empire purportedly consisting of Great Britain and the Vatican plus several "secret societies" that claim "ownership" of the USA and that the American People are their slaves.
This evil empire dates back centuries before the Declaration of Independence and The Constitution, and alleges that neither the Declaration nor the Constitution mean what they say; that the founding fathers were not interested in the People when creating those documents; that the People are not a party to the Constitution and therefore has no application to them. Some historians claim that it was written to fool the People into believing they were free in order to quell them after popular uprisings and unrest during that colonial period.
There are many essays on the internet regarding this fraudulent history involving our country. This evil world empire is the ancestry of the foreign power operating here in America. Because it alleges that the People are not a party to the Constitution, the foreign power here is "a jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution" as it was in Great Britain. Instead of the king, the judiciary are at the helm of the foreign power operating under the guise and color of "government" here under the false illusion that they are justified in disregarding the Constitution and the People's rights because they take their orders from England. See Federal Judge States in Court that He Gets His Orders From England by Stephen Kimbol Ames
Mr. Ames has authored The Ultimate Delusion which gives all the sordid details of this evil world empire. It appears on several websites which you can choose for yourselves to read for your information and education. But brace yourselves--it is shocking and unbelievable! J.A.I.L. does not endorse this information, as it is based entirely on fraud and fictions intentionally designed as a sinister, evil plot to deceive the American People. J.A.I.L.'s purpose is to unveil this deception.
Joseph Clark, author of "Once Upon a Time There Was No Money" in referring to the essay by Mr. Ames, said what the People must do to eliminate the system:
Elimination of the system: I will give you the answer here; we must stop giving the systems that be lip service and start ignoring them and stop believing in it because as we fear it and fight with it we give our power away to it. This causes the systems to see we are both in need of it and that we want it to continue to run or should I say ruin our lives. It is our own fault the system exists as it does and it is up to us to rid ourselves of it.
Some people believe in the legitimacy of this evil propaganda. As long as they continue to give lip service to the fraud, it will continue as it has for so many years. They make it difficult for the rest of us who don't believe in it and want to get J.A.I.L. passed and hold the judiciary accountable under the Constitution that does exist and will continue to exist as long as it is sociologically accepted as the Supreme Law of the Land by practice, custom and usage in society. It is taught in history, ruled on (rightly or wrongly) by judges, shown in documentaries, oaths purportedly taken to defend it, given to the public in booklet form free of charge by state officials. In public, there is a Constitution; in private and secret, there is none; "the People aren't a party to it." As long as the foreign power publicly leads the People into believing we live under constitutional law, that's the standard which becomes sociologically accepted by the People and under which the foreign power will be held accountable. With what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. (Mt.7:2)
We keep telling those people that judges will be given the opportunity to present their defense to the Special Grand Jury of why they willfully violated the Constitution as alleged. If their defense is based on anything relating to the contents of the essay "The Ultimate Delusion," or any other fraud and fiction, it will be deemed unacceptable and the judge will be subject to trial, stripped of judicial immunity, if pursued by the petitioner. "There is no Constitution" is not a valid argument, and we, the People, better understand why. Learn the truth-- don't continue believing the lie and giving sustenance to the foreign power!

J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability Initiative Law) www.jail4judges. org

To be automatically added to future mailings, place the word Subscribe in the subject line and email to VictoryUSA@jail4jud

We are a ministry in great need of your financial support. Please donate to this important work at "J.A.I.L." P.O. Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603

J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our Constitution heretofore unrealized.

JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!

E-Group sign on at http://groups. group/jail4judge s/join

Visit our active flash - http://www.jail4jud _001.htm

No comments: