What the bleap? Bleap - Bleap

Friday, May 1, 2009

Under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which is a Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 199 Senate Russell Building, Washington, DC 20510, represented by Democrats Carl Levin Chairman (D-MI), Thomas R. Carper (D-DE), Mark L. Pryor (D-AR), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Jon Tester (D-MT), Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Republicans Tom Coburn Acting Ranking Member (R-OK), Susan M. Collins (R-ME), John McCain (R-AZ), and John Ensign (R-NV), the IRS has merged with certain arrogant government tyrants in the name of the Department of Homeland Security to produce the Biggest Conspiracy I have ever seen. It's got RICO all over it, but because the set of foreign trusts represented as the IRS now extend to the Department of Homeland Security where action have gone international it is bigger than anyone can ever imagine.

BACKGROUND ON THE IRS

It was the Act of July 1, 1862 which created the Office of the Commissioner of the IRS (Glavey v. United States, 182 U.S. 595, 607, 21 S.Ct. 891 (1901)), but that Act (and associated acts) was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873 and "direct taxes [within the 48 continental united states] without apportionment was forbidden" (See Pollock v. Farmer's Loan & Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601 (1895); Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582 (1937)).

Knowledge of this fact was, in part, the reason we brought our Qui Tam Action (Case No. 08-cv-0280) against the Named Accused "Government Contractor (the IRS)" as the Trust (internal revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) which was created under the passage of Reorganization Act No. 1189 dated July 2, 1904, and which resulted in the creation of the offices of "Bureau of Internal Revenue" on August 1, 1904.

HOW THIS RELATES TO OUR SUIT AGAINST THE IRS

We identified the Trust listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) simply because (1) it preexisted the similar Trust (Internal Revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(62) and (2), the Trust (Internal Revenue) listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(62) simply extended the same Taxing Powers to Puerto Rico as another of the United States' possessions since 1898, becoming a commonwealth in 1952, and because 50 USC § 1801(o) defines the term "State" so as to have meanings which include any "State of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States" and because, (3) the Act of July 1, 1862 was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873.

What all of this means in the context of the various sections of US Code including 31 USC § 3801(6) and 26 USC § 7701(a)(1) is that the Trust itself is a "person" liable for the acts of a Commissioner and/or Internal Revenue Officers in which operations exist outside of the Trust's geographical application (i.e., in this case even when the word "State" its' meaning is such that it is limited in terms of the nation's federal district(s) including District of Columbia relative to insular possessions of the United States) and finally, (5) given that (a) the Act of July 1, 1862 was repealed by the adoption of the Revised Statutes of 1873, (b) the taxing authority authorized pursuant to Article 4 § 3(2) involves a jurisdiction of the Trust listed at 31 USC § 1321(a)(2) which is limited in terms of the insular possessions of the United States and/or the District of Columbia (i.e., the nation's federal district(s)), and as such, we have submitted that cases like Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 441, 6 S.Ct. 1121 (1886) are a testimony to our assertions that when Congress has never authorized the Named Accused "Government Contractor (31 USC § 1321(a)(2)) to operate or encroach into 50 States of the Union and is therefore is liable for the acts of a Commissioner and/or Internal Revenue Officers in which operations exist outside of the Trust's geographical application (i.e., limited in terms of the nation's federal district(s) including the District of Columbia relative to insular possessions of the United States) which violate the fundamental rights of the People for which there is protection in the Federal Constitution (see Chas. C. Steward Mach. Co. v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582 (1937)).

And of course, knowledge of all this was a part of the reason my wife and I filed our "public interest suit" which involves many Constitutional Rights Violations including Peonage, Major Fraud, Mail and Bank Fraud, and sets forth thirty-eight pages of Causes of Action, listing fifty-eight separate Causes of Action which have been developed against the IRS as a Government Contractor rather than the United States. Causes of Action include that IRS Officials were involved in the suppression of evidence submitted to the Senate Finance Committee (Exhibit 3), following which IRS Officials publicly announced that WTP Petitions were being responded to with enforcement actions (Exhibit 4). All of this, of course, has been followed by many other enforcement actions essentially meant to overthrow the Constitution and have even been perpetrated upon the District Court in which falsified damages/and IRS falsification of damages (False Claims) includes Fraud upon the Court in a § 6700 suit against our participating organization (United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress (Case No. 1:07-cv-0352)), in violation of our Rights of Privacy and Free Association.

Anyone interested in our case can look at our site at www.greenes.us and ALL of our case documents are presented at http://www.greenes.us/civildocket.html. Our Appeal Brief and the Appendix to Appeal Brief were recorded as having been received the week of 02/26/2009, and now the Appellant Section for the IRS had requested an extension of time of 21 days, to May 11, 2009, and the Order and Scheduling Order #3 has been filed, where the IRS's (Appellee's) brief is expected to be served and filed on or before 05/11/2009. I already got all the ink and paper I will need for the next round of paperwork. After which, the Argument of the Appeal may be heard as early as the week of 06/22/2009, and I'll still need help with the traveling expenses and parking fees, etc., to go down to the Court of Appeal in New York City to present the Appeal.

BUT AGAIN, IT IS BIGGER THAN ANYONE CAN EVER IMAGINE

One must consider the fact that what myself and my wife have gotten into here is bigger than anyone can ever imagine, for now under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which is a Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, 199 Senate Russell Building, Washington, DC 20510, represented by Democrats Carl Levin Chairman (D-MI), Thomas R. Carper (D-DE), Mark L. Pryor (D-AR), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Jon Tester (D-MT), Michael Bennet (D-CO), and Republicans Tom Coburn Acting Ranking Member (R-OK), Susan M. Collins (R-ME), John McCain (R-AZ), and John Ensign (R-NV), the IRS has merged with certain arrogant government tyrants in the name of the Department of Homeland Security to produce the Biggest Conspiracy I have ever seen. It's got RICO all over it, but because the set of foreign trusts represented as the IRS now extend to the Department of Homeland Security where action have gone international it is bigger than anyone can ever imagine.

In spite of all this, we go on and we are now moving again before the 2nd Circuit USCA (08-06284-cv), where we are asking the USCA to Vacate the District Court's most recent Order And REMAND the case back to the USDC For Northern New York, in Albany New York for a second time. If that happens, it will mean that the 2^nd Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with us and allows us to sue the IRS independent of the United States and the case will be opened up for joiners.

I don't know though - I mean the very idea that the IRS is now operating under the guise of the United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs seems mind boggling to me. In any event, if the 2^nd Circuit Court of Appeals agrees with us and allows us to sue the IRS independent of the United States, at that point, all joiners will automatically have the signatory status of "Private Attorneys General" (de jure) and guaranteed protections pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988, Qualified Criminal Investigators pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1510 and Federal Witnesses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1512.

Blessings,

Bill

As you might imagine and as you can plainly see from all of the above, this has been a LOT for us (my wife and I) to do, and, at times, it is hard to fully realize that we are not so alone in all this. THANK YOU Each and Every One of You!!! References for further study include http://www.greenes.us/index.html, as well as http://www.greenes.us/aboutus.html, http://www.greenes.us/notanagency.html, http://www.greenes.us/truckdrivers.html, http://www.greenes.us/Karenspage.html,